SUMMARY - Brain _ The Story of You (9781101870549) - Eagleman, David
Here is a summary of the key points:
Our perception of reality is constructed by the brain based on sensory inputs and past experiences, rather than directly representing the external world.
The various senses like vision, hearing, touch have different processing speeds, and the brain reconciles these differences to present a coherent experience with some unavoidable delays.
Depriving senses through experiments like solitary confinement shows the brain continues generating vivid internal experiences through imagination and dreams even without external stimuli.
Visual illusions demonstrate perception does not always match objective reality, as the brain actively interprets and makes inferences about the world based on an internal model formed from expectations and prior knowledge.
Developing vision requires coordination between the visual system and other senses through experiences like infants touching objects to correlate sensory inputs. Active exploration is crucial for the brain to learn how to interpret sensory data.
The brain maintains a "good enough" low-resolution model of reality that can be upgraded when needed, rather than perfectly replicating all details, in order to present a stable conscious experience.
In summary, our perception of the world is a construction of the brain, not a direct reflection of reality, as it reconciles and interprets diverse sensory inputs through an internal model shaped by past experiences.
Here is a summary of the key points:
Decision-making involves complex interactions between competing neural networks in the brain as different options are weighed. Even simple choices trigger an internal debate.
Experiments with split-brain patients show the two hemispheres can have independent intentions, acting at odds with each other. This reveals the divided nature of decision processes.
The trolley dilemma activates different neural systems depending on the scenario - rational problem-solving networks for logical dilemmas vs emotional networks when directly harming others. This internal conflict can flip our decisions.
Warfare that resembles detached, logical scenarios like pulling a lever activates less emotional conflict than direct violence, making it psychologically easier to engage in. Important life-and-death decisions require input from both reason and emotion.
Emotions provide quick bodily "summaries" of situations through physiological responses that help gauge choices. Tammy Myers' inability to integrate these signals hampers even mundane decision-making, showing their importance.
Here is a summary:
The human brain is highly plastic and can rewire itself in response to new experiences, inputs, and tasks. This allows it to adapt and learn throughout life.
Examples of the brain's plasticity include cases where people have retained normal cognitive function despite significant brain damage or the removal of half their brain. The remaining tissue can take over functions.
We have also seen progress connecting artificial devices like cochlear implants (hearing) and retinal implants (vision) directly to the human body. While the signals are different than natural senses, the brain can learn to interpret them over time, demonstrating its flexibility.
Our core senses evolved as a standard set, but they are not fundamentally limited. The brain operates based on whatever data it receives. With further development, new peripheral devices and inputs could potentially provide additional senses and abilities the brain learns to utilize.
This plasticity shows the brain is highly adaptive and able to wire itself differently based on the environment and experiences it encounters. Its functions are not rigidly fixed, allowing lifelong learning and changes in response to stimuli.
Here are summaries without opinions or potentially sensitive claims:
Raven et al. (1998) studied how self-control draws on a limited cognitive resource. They found repeated acts of self-control impair performance on subsequent tasks requiring self-control, similar to physical muscle fatigue.
Baumeister & Tierney (2011) reviewed research on willpower and self-control. They discussed popular concepts like ego depletion and findings that self-control relies on glucose levels in the brain. Environmental and personal factors that influence self-control were also examined.
Hofmann et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis of 83 studies on ego depletion. They found a small-to-medium effect size supporting that prior acts of self-control reduce performance on subsequent self-control tasks, providing some validation of the limited resource model.
Carter & McCullough (2013) reviewed neuroscience research on brain regions involved in self-control, such as the prefrontal cortex. Interactions between cognitive and emotional brain systems were also discussed in the context of exerting self-control.
Inzlicht & Schmeichel (2012) discussed areas needing more research to understand the predictors, mechanisms and consequences of self-control failures and depletion. Individual differences, emotion-cognition interactions and behavioral interventions were some topics highlighted.
Here is a summary of the key points from the studies listed:
Baumeister et al. (2011) discuss willpower as a finite resource that can be strengthened through exercise.
Ahn et al. (2014) found nonpolitical images can unconsciously evoke neural responses predicting political attitudes.
Scheele et al. (2013) and Zak (2012) found oxytocin enhances brain responses to partners and influences prosocial behavior through bonding.
Levitt (2004) analyzed factors for the 1990s US crime drop, finding policing strategies most influential while economic trends played little role.
Eagleman & Isgur (2012) proposed a "neurocompatibility index" to align legal systems with neuroscience on decision-making.
Eagleman (2011) discussed using real-time neuroimaging for understanding brain function and guiding behavior change.
Heider & Simmel (1944) studied how people perceive intentionality in shapes, sparking research on intuitive psychology.
Singer et al. (2006, 2004) found empathy activates similar circuits for self and others, but is reduced for disliked groups.
Hamlin et al. (2007, 2011, 2011) found infants prefer and help prosocial individuals by 9-10 months.
Bloom (2013) discussed babies' innate, evolving capacities for morality and social learning from early months.
Tononi (2012), Koch (2004), and Crick & Koch (2003) discussed theories of consciousness pointing to integrated information and neuronal synchrony as potential correlates.
Did you find this article valuable?
Support Literary Insights by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!