SUMMARY - How to Grow a Human - Philip Ball



Here is a summary of the key points from the passage:

  • Proteins carry out biochemical functions that can influence many different traits, rather than having a direct one-to-one relationship with a single trait.

  • The genome provides the basic set of instructions for building an organism, but does not dictate exactly how those instructions will be carried out or the specific traits/structures that will emerge, as development and gene expression are complex dynamic processes.

  • Franklin Harold likens the genome to a "Glass Bead Game" where it functions like a master player engaged in an intricate system of cues and responses, shaped both internally and by environmental factors.

  • Genes influence but do not fully determine traits and behaviors, as their effects are filtered through development which depends on environmental and experiential factors.

  • Early genetics concepts like "blueprint" or "program" do not fully capture the complexity of relationships between genes, development, traits, and the environment.

    Here is a summary of the key points:

  • Physicians discovered a patient named Mrs. McK with two different blood types detected in her body, which was unusual.

  • Mrs. McK had a twin brother who died as a baby. The explanation is that twins share a blood circulation in the womb, allowing exchange of blood-forming cells between twins before birth.

  • Robert Race coined the term "chimera" to describe cases like Mrs. McK's where more than one biological identity is present in a single organism due to cell exchange between twins in utero.

  • More dramatically, a person's entire body can be a patchwork of cells from two individuals through fusion of non-identical twin embryos early in development, creating a "tetragametic chimera" with a mixed genome.

  • Cell exchange can also happen between mother and fetus via the placenta, leading to long-term microchimerism with a small number of each other's cells persisting.

  • Cases of chimerism challenge concepts of personal identity and relationships based on assumptions of a single genome within an individual.

    Here is a summary:

  • Cancer research and immunology have shown that our sense of self at the somatic level is more fragile than typically assumed.

  • Our bodies host trillions of microorganisms that help regulate processes like nutrient absorption and immune function. Disruptions to the microbial community can influence health.

  • Cells in our body are constantly dying and regenerating. Through normal cell turnover or injury, our bodies replace approximately 1% of cells per day.

  • Cancer results from our own cells accumulating genetic mutations and escaping control mechanisms. Transplants also rely on our bodies accepting foreign cells and tissues.

  • A more flexible view recognizes that our somatic identity is not fixed or isolated, but exists in relationship with our internal and external environments.

  • More inclusive concepts of kinship and selfhood that do not rely strictly on biological or genetic relatedness may be needed to understand our interconnectedness on cellular and microbial levels.

    Here is a summary:

  • The human body maintains complex interactions between diverse cell types and microbial symbionts that are crucial for health and development.

  • The immune system not only fights pathogens but also regulates processes like inflammation, tissue repair, and self-tolerance to avoid autoimmunity. Cancer immunotherapy harnesses immunity against tumors.

  • The human microbiome, comprising gut bacteria and other microbes, aids digestion and provides vital nutrients through mutualistic relationships. It may influence conditions like stress and depression.

  • Stem cell plasticity and reprogramming challenges the idea that cell fate is permanently fixed. Induced pluripotent stem cells show differentiated cells can reverse their developmental trajectory.

  • Organoids generated from stem cells are advancing research into human development, disease modeling, and drug testing while reducing reliance on animal experiments. Continued work is needed to fully guide organoid development.

  • Direct lineage reprogramming transforms one adult cell type into another without returning to a stem cell state, opening new possibilities for regenerative medicine if control over cell fate improves.

    Here is a summary:

  • Researchers have made progress in directly reprogramming cell states and identities in the body through gene therapies, with applications to regenerative medicine. This includes generating beta cells to alleviate diabetes symptoms, light-sensitive neurons to reverse blindness, and hair cells to restore hearing.

  • Glial cells have been reprogrammed into neuronal stem cells for brain and spinal cord repair, and connective tissue into heart muscle cells. Work is also being done to reactivate proliferation in adults to enable organ regeneration.

  • However, the effects are often transient and more work is needed to improve efficiency and safety. While promising starts have been shown, further refinement is required before these approaches can become established human therapies. Direct reprogramming seems to work better inside the body than in dishes alone.

In summary, direct reprogramming of cell identities holds potential for regenerative medicine but still faces technical challenges that need to be overcome through additional research.

Here is a summary:

  • Mitochondrial replacement therapy aims to prevent the inheritance of mitochondrial diseases by transplanting the chromosomes of an egg from a woman with mitochondrial disease into a donor egg with healthy mitochondria and no chromosomes. This technique was recently approved for use in the UK.

  • Critics argue this amounts to genetic alteration of the germ line, as babies conceived through this method would contain DNA from three people - the mother, father, and egg donor. Critics label these babies "three-parent babies" to invoke a moral response.

  • Supporters counter that the term "three-parent baby" is misleading, as the donated mitochondria only account for a very small percentage of DNA and are not intended to alter physical traits. They view the therapy as preventing disease instead of genetic modification.

  • The debate touches on issues like what defines biological parenthood and genetic identity. As techniques advance, it raises questions about where to draw ethical and regulatory lines around altering heredity and future generations.

    Here is a summary of the key points:

  • The concept of the "brain in a vat" originated with philosophers like Descartes who questioned how we can know if our experiences of the world are real or just illusions created by some external stimulator of the brain. It suggests our consciousness could be detached from any physical body.

  • This idea was further explored in science fiction like The Matrix, where humans are unaware that their minds are trapped in a simulated reality. Philosophers have debated issues like whether we can refer to real objects if our experiences are simulated.

  • Advances in virtual reality and simulations raise new versions of this problem. For example, with highly advanced VR, could we be conscious virtual agents with no connection to a physical substrate?

  • Most neuroscientists think consciousness is tightly bound to physical brain processes and our bodies' interactions with the real world. Merely simulating inputs to a brain won't necessarily replicate consciousness without the complex, evolved neural architecture.

  • However, as simulations become more immersive, questions will remain about separating subjective experience from objective reality, and how we would know if our sense of worldly existence was artificially implanted or intrinsically derived.

    Here is a summary:

  • Stephen Hawking relied heavily on assistive technology to communicate due to his disabilities. Some argue this amounted to functioning like a "brain in a vat" connected to machines, highlighting our increasing interconnectedness with technology.

  • The "brain in a vat" scenario remains a philosophical thought experiment about the nature of reality, experience, and our relationship to technology. It is used to explore questions about what constitutes a person and where identity and consciousness reside.

The key points are that Stephen Hawking's extensive use of technology to cope with his disabilities led some to view him as analogous to the hypothetical "brain in a vat" scenario. This philosophical construct questions where the boundaries of the self and mind lie when heavily augmented by machines. The passage frames it as an ongoing thought experiment about human identity and experience in an increasingly technological world.

Here is a summary of the key points about stem cell and organoid technologies discussed in the provided references:

  • Several articles discussed how organoid technologies have advanced significantly over the past decade, allowing researchers to generate mini-organs and organ-like structures from stem cells that can model human development, disease and respond to drugs.

  • Lancaster et al. (2013) demonstrated that human cerebral organoids formed from stem cells could model human brain development and recapitulate phenotypes of genetic disorders like microcephaly.

  • Other references discussed applications of organoids to model diseases, screen drugs, replace damaged tissues, gain insights into early human development and provide alternatives to animal testing.

  • However, some articles also addressed ethical issues arising from this research, such as debates around the moral status of early organoids and human embryos, as well as safety concerns regarding human germline genome editing.

  • Overall, the references highlighted both the scientific promise and ongoing progress of organoid technologies, while also acknowledging important regulatory and ethical considerations surrounding their clinical and biomedical applications.

Did you find this article valuable?

Support Literary Insights by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!