SUMMARY - The Road to Unfreedom_ Russia, Europe, America - Timothy Snyder



Here is a summary:

  • Ilyin promoted a fascist political philosophy of national redemption under a totalitarian leader, but did not address the issue of succession after the leader's death.

  • Similarly, the Soviet system was based on perpetual revolution towards an inevitable endpoint, rather than stable political institutions that could facilitate an orderly transition of power.

  • When Stalin passed away, it threatened instability for the USSR since he had consolidated power through violence and intimidation rather than established principles of democratic succession.

  • Later Soviet leaders like Brezhnev replaced Marxist ideas of progress with nostalgia and portrayals of Russia as an eternal victim to legitimize their rule, but this obscured real history and policy issues rather than providing a foundation for long-term continuity of governance.

  • Both Ilyin's fascist vision for Russia and the Soviet system struggled with the challenge of political succession and maintaining stability/order when theoretical redeemers or prophets of historical inevitability were removed from power. Propaganda and manufactured myths were used as short-term replacements but did not solve the underlying issue.

    Here is a summary of the key points:

  • After the fall of communism, many former Eastern bloc countries saw EU membership as a way to embrace Western democratic values and make a "return to Europe" away from Russian domination.

  • However, once in the EU, some nations began glorifying imagined nationalist pasts and presenting themselves solely as victims, forgetting why their states failed previously due to lack of stability, rule of law, etc.

  • Without shared history lessons, narratives emerged that EU membership was a choice rather than necessity, allowing notions that countries could leave and return to romanticized pasts outside integration.

  • Russia under Putin could not establish rule of law or democratic succession, so positioned itself as an opposing model to the EU's values of prosperity and freedom. In 2012, Putin pivoted to define the West as a threat based on differing values rather than geopolitics.

  • The European integration project provided post-war stability and sovereignty through shared laws and democracy, unlike traditional empires which controlled through military might alone. However, some newer EU members now question this necessity of integration.

    Here is a summary of the key events:

  • In late 2013, protests began in Kyiv's Maidan square in response to the Ukrainian government suspending preparations for closer ties with the European Union. Students and activists gathered to protest this decision.

  • Over several months, the protests grew significantly as more Ukrainians joined in calling for closer EU integration and the resignation of President Yanukovych. The demonstrations became known as the Euromaidan Revolution.

  • In January 2014, new anti-protest laws were passed and violence erupted as protesters clashed with police. Nearly 100 protesters were killed in only a few days.

  • Facing widespread unrest, Yanukovych fled Ukraine in late February 2014. The parliament voted to remove him from power and set new elections.

  • Russia denounced these events as an illegal coup and subsequently annexed Crimea from Ukraine in March 2014 after deploying troops. It also supported a separatist uprising in eastern Ukraine.

  • Fighting escalated between Ukrainian government forces and Russian-backed separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk. A ceasefire agreement was reached in early 2015 but clashes continued.

  • The conflict remains ongoing and has led to severe tensions between Ukraine and Russia, further straining their relationship. Ukraine continues to seek closer integration with Western institutions like NATO and the EU.

    Here is a summary of the key points about the Maidan protests in Ukraine and Russia's response:

  • The Maidan protests in 2013-2014 were a largely peaceful, grassroots movement representing diverse groups across Ukraine in response to President Yanukovych's rejection of an EU trade deal and increased repression.

  • Russia strongly opposed Ukrainian integration with the West and put political and financial pressure on Yanukovych. When protests erupted, Russia backed violent crackdowns that backfired and inflamed protests.

  • Yanukovych fled in February 2014. Russia then invaded Crimea using "little green men" and installed a puppet government. It claimed this was to protect ethnic Russians but violated Ukrainian sovereignty.

  • Kremlin propaganda portrayed the Maidan as a fascist coup backed by a morally corrupt West. However, subsequent Ukrainian elections showed little far-right support and the new government included Russian speakers.

  • Some far-right groups from Europe backed Russia's narrative and gained terrorist training in eastern Ukraine. But the Maidan was initially about corruption and democracy, not ideology.

  • Russia denied facts on the ground in Ukraine to sow uncertainty at home and abroad per its "politics of eternity" focused on preserving a myth of Russian innocence and undermining alternative narratives. This break from shared Soviet history challenged Ukraine's new emerging identity.

    Here is a summary:

  • The passage discusses Russia's strategy of using hybrid warfare tactics like cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and covert operations to undermine pro-Western governments and bolster far-right nationalist political forces in Europe.

  • In Germany, Russia sought to support the far-right AfD party and damage Chancellor Merkel by penetrating government networks, exacerbating the refugee crisis through military actions in Syria, and propagating a false rape story. This boosted anti-immigrant sentiment and AfD support.

  • In Poland, secret recordings of politicians were released without consent, eroding trust in the ruling party and benefiting more pro-Russian political interests.

  • Right-wing Polish politician Antoni Macierewicz also gained politically from a tape scandal in 2014 and was later appointed Defense Minister despite a history of supporting pro-Russian policies that ran counter to Polish national interests.

  • The passage illustrates how Russia employs unconventional military and propaganda tactics as part of a long-term strategy to disrupt European unity, weaken Western alliances like NATO, and install nationalist governments receptive to Russian influence across Central/Eastern Europe.

    Here is a summary of the key points:

  • Andrzej Macierewicz questioned the official investigation into the 2010 Smolensk plane crash that killed Polish leaders and instead promoted an unsupported conspiracy theory implicating the Polish government and Russia. This deepened political divisions.

  • As Defense Minister, Macierewicz appointed some officials with unclear or pro-Russian ties. He made changes that decreased military professionalism and increased a paramilitary force under his personal control.

  • Under his influence, Polish foreign policy shifted away from strong support for Ukrainian independence and adopted a more pro-Russian stance, surprising Western allies.

  • Macierewicz has connections to American politicians seen as too sympathetic to Russian interests, raising questions about his own allegiances.

  • Allegations of his Russian ties led him to attack journalists instead of providing answers, and he tried to prosecute one for terrorism for publishing a book about his Moscow links.

  • He was eventually replaced as Defense Minister in 2018 as Poland faced criticism over rule of law issues from the EU.

    Here is a summary of the key points:

  • Ivan Ilyin was a Russian philosopher in the early 20th century who promoted ideas of conservatism and fascism.

  • His writings espoused a view of history as an eternal struggle between Russia and the West, without potential for change or reform.

  • Ilyin's work was rediscovered and promoted under Putin as offering a vision of Russia's special, inevitable destiny.

  • Putin's advisor Vladislav Surkov embraced Ilyin's deterministic, eternal view of history pitting Russia against the West without room for progress.

  • This resurrection of Ilyin's philosophy contributed to a turn away from democracy in Russia by denying the ability to alter the country's political course through reforms or popular will.

  • It promoted a nationalism defined by permanent conflict rather than civic principles of equality and inclusion that could unite diverse populations.

So in summary, it discusses how Ilyin's resurgent ideas of history as eternal struggle undermined democratic reform in Russia by denying the potential for political change.

Here is a summary of the key points:

  • Protests in Ukraine began in late 2013 in response to President Yanukovych rejecting an EU trade deal and instead pursuing closer ties with Russia.

  • In January 2014, violent clashes broke out as Yanukovych passed harsh anti-protest laws. Over 100 protesters were killed by security forces in February.

  • Negotiations between Yanukovych and opposition leaders failed to resolve the crisis in February. Yanukovych fled Kyiv on February 21 after a deal was reached.

  • Russia annexed Crimea in late February/early March 2014 through military intervention. Russian troops seized control of the peninsula and backed a referendum on secession.

  • The situation escalated Russo-Ukrainian tensions as Russia grew from supporting pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine to direct military involvement by summer 2014. This led to armed conflict and international condemnation of Russian actions.

The summary highlights the key events that sparked the Euromaidan revolution in Ukraine, the ouster of Yanukovych, Russia's annexation of Crimea, and escalating conflict in eastern Ukraine in response to Ukrainian efforts to pursue closer EU ties.

Here is a summary:

  • In late 2016/early 2017, reports surfaced of unusual server activity between a Trump Organization server and Alfa Bank in Russia, one of whose founders has ties to Putin. This raised questions about possible secret backchannels of communication between the Trump campaign and Russia.

  • cybersecurity experts found that the server activity pattern was unusual and unlikely to be spam, but its purpose was not entirely clear. Alfa Bank denied having any communications or business ties to Trump.

  • The FBI investigated but ultimately found no conclusive evidence of improper or illegal communications. Some experts remain uncertain or believe more information is needed.

  • The server activity coincided with the timing of Russian hacking efforts to influence the 2016 US election. While not conclusive on its own, it added to concerns about Trump-Russia connections that were being probed by the FBI and Senate.

So in summary, the articles discussed reported unusual server activity linking Trump Organization and a Russian bank, which was investigated but its significance and purpose remained ambiguous and unproven in establishing improper communications regarding the 2016 campaign. It contributed to the broader context of inquiries into Trump-Russia ties.

Here is a summary of the key points:

  • The communications between Russia and the Trump campaign during the 2016 election remain uncertain and were the subject of investigation.

  • Trump aides like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, Carter Page, and Jared Kushner had connections to Russia before and during the campaign that drew FBI scrutiny.

  • Steve Bannon promoted an ultranationalist agenda and sought to cultivate ties between far-right groups in the US, Europe, and Russia. He saw Trump's election as an opportunity to advance this ideology.

  • Questions remain about the Trump campaign's connections to Russia and whether these ties improperly influenced American foreign policymaking or domestic politics. The communications remain unclear.

Did you find this article valuable?

Support Literary Insights by becoming a sponsor. Any amount is appreciated!